2010 Acura RDX vs 2010 Volvo XC90
Published figures side by side. Rows where our sources have no value for a vehicle read “Not available”. Configurations differ within a model year, so ranges are shown where they apply.
| Specification | 2010 Acura RDX | 2010 Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | 2.3L 4-cylinder turbocharged | Varies by configuration: 3.2L 6-cylinder, 4.4L 8-cylinder |
| Displacement | 2.3 L | 3.2 L to 4.4 L |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 to 8 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Power | Not available | 449 hp (335 kW) |
| Torque | Not available | 523 lb-ft (709 Nm) |
| Fuel type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | Not available | 5.3 s |
| Top speed | Not available | 112 mph (180 km/h) |
| Towing capacity | Not available | 4,960 lb (2,250 kg) |
| Transmission and drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Gears | 5 | 6 |
| Drivetrain | Varies by configuration: FWD, AWD | Varies by configuration: AWD, FWD |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | Not available | 195.0 in (4,953 mm) |
| Width | Not available | 79.1 in (2,008 mm) |
| Height | Not available | 69.9 in (1,776 mm) |
| Wheelbase | Not available | 117.5 in (2,984 mm) |
| Ground clearance | Not available | 9.4 in (238 mm) |
| Weight | ||
| Curb weight | Not available | 5,148 lb (2,335 kg) |
| Fuel economy and range | ||
| Combined | 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) to 19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) | 18 mpg (13.1 L/100 km) to 15 mpg (15.7 L/100 km) |
| City | 19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) to 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) | 15 mpg (15.7 L/100 km) to 13 mpg (18.1 L/100 km) |
| Highway | 24 mpg (9.8 L/100 km) to 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) | 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) |
| Electric range | Not available | 33 mi (53 km) |
| Battery capacity | Not available | 18.8 kWh |
| Capacity | ||
| Seats | Not available | 7 |
| Doors | Not available | 5 |