1992 Chevrolet C2500 Pickup vs 1992 Ford F150

Published figures side by side. Rows where our sources have no value for a vehicle read “Not available”. Configurations differ within a model year, so ranges are shown where they apply.

Specification comparison
Specification	1992 Chevrolet C2500 Pickup	1992 Ford F150
Engine
Engine	Varies by configuration: 4.3L 6-cylinder ((FFS) (SPFI)), 5.0L 8-cylinder ((FFS)), 5.7L 8-cylinder ((350 V8) (FFS)), 6.2L 8-cylinder ((NO-CAT))	Varies by configuration: 4.9L 6-cylinder ((FFS)), 5.0L 8-cylinder ((FFS)), 5.8L 8-cylinder ((FFS))
Displacement	4.3 L to 6.2 L	4.9 L to 5.8 L
Cylinders	6 to 8	6 to 8
Aspiration	Not available	Twin-turbocharged
Power	Not available	400 hp (298 kW)
Torque	Not available	500 lb-ft (678 Nm)
Fuel type	Varies by configuration: Gasoline, Diesel	Gasoline
Performance
0–100 km/h	Not available	5.6 s
Top speed	Not available	112 mph (180 km/h)
Towing capacity	Not available	13,999 lb (6,350 kg)
Payload	Not available	2,315 lb (1,050 kg)
Transmission and drivetrain
Transmission	Varies by configuration: Automatic, Manual	Varies by configuration: Automatic, Manual
Gears	4 to 5	4 to 5
Drivetrain	RWD	Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD
Dimensions
Length	Not available	231.7 in (5,885 mm)
Width	Not available	79.9 in (2,029 mm)
Height	Not available	77.2 in (1,961 mm)
Wheelbase	Not available	145.4 in (3,693 mm)
Ground clearance	Not available	9.4 in (239 mm)
Weight
Curb weight	Not available	5,016 lb (2,275 kg)
Fuel economy and range
Combined	19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) to 13 mpg (18.1 L/100 km)	15 mpg (15.7 L/100 km) to 12 mpg (19.6 L/100 km)
City	17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) to 12 mpg (19.6 L/100 km)	14 mpg (16.8 L/100 km) to 11 mpg (21.4 L/100 km)
Highway	22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 16 mpg (14.7 L/100 km)	17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) to 14 mpg (16.8 L/100 km)
Capacity
Seats	Not available	6
Doors	Not available	4