2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2000 Honda CR-V
Published figures side by side. Rows where our sources have no value for a vehicle read “Not available”. Configurations differ within a model year, so ranges are shown where they apply.
| Specification | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Honda CR-V |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | Varies by configuration: 1.6L 4-cylinder, 2.0L 4-cylinder | 2.0L 4-cylinder |
| Displacement | 1.6 L to 2.0 L | 2.0 L |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Aspiration | Not available | Naturally aspirated |
| Power | Not available | 204 hp (152 kW) |
| Torque | Not available | 247 lb-ft (335 Nm) |
| Fuel type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | Not available | 7.6 s |
| Top speed | Not available | 115 mph (185 km/h) |
| Towing capacity | Not available | 1,499 lb (680 kg) |
| Transmission and drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Varies by configuration: Manual, Automatic | Varies by configuration: Automatic, Manual |
| Gears | 4 to 5 | 4 to 5 |
| Drivetrain | Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD | Varies by configuration: FWD, AWD |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | Not available | 184.8 in (4,694 mm) |
| Width | Not available | 73.4 in (1,864 mm) |
| Height | Not available | 66.6 in (1,692 mm) |
| Wheelbase | Not available | 106.3 in (2,700 mm) |
| Ground clearance | Not available | 8.2 in (208 mm) |
| Weight | ||
| Curb weight | Not available | 3,924 lb (1,780 kg) |
| Fuel economy and range | ||
| Combined | 24 mpg (9.8 L/100 km) to 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) | 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) |
| City | 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 20 mpg (11.8 L/100 km) | 20 mpg (11.8 L/100 km) to 19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) |
| Highway | 26 mpg (9.0 L/100 km) to 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km) | 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km) |
| Capacity | ||
| Seats | Not available | 5 |
| Doors | Not available | 5 |