2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs 2000 Land Rover Range Rover
Published figures side by side. Rows where our sources have no value for a vehicle read “Not available”. Configurations differ within a model year, so ranges are shown where they apply.
| Specification | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Land Rover Range Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | Varies by configuration: 1.6L 4-cylinder, 2.0L 4-cylinder | Varies by configuration: 4.0L 8-cylinder, 4.6L 8-cylinder |
| Displacement | 1.6 L to 2.0 L | 4.0 L to 4.6 L |
| Cylinders | 4 | 8 |
| Fuel type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission and drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Varies by configuration: Manual, Automatic | Automatic |
| Gears | 4 to 5 | 4 |
| Drivetrain | Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD | AWD |
| Fuel economy and range | ||
| Combined | 24 mpg (9.8 L/100 km) to 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) | 13 mpg (18.1 L/100 km) to 12 mpg (19.6 L/100 km) |
| City | 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 20 mpg (11.8 L/100 km) | 12 mpg (19.6 L/100 km) to 11 mpg (21.4 L/100 km) |
| Highway | 26 mpg (9.0 L/100 km) to 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km) | 16 mpg (14.7 L/100 km) to 14 mpg (16.8 L/100 km) |