1985 Dodge Power Ram 50 Pickup vs 1985 Mitsubishi Truck
Published figures side by side. Rows where our sources have no value for a vehicle read “Not available”. Configurations differ within a model year, so ranges are shown where they apply.
| Specification | 1985 Dodge Power Ram 50 Pickup | 1985 Mitsubishi Truck |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | Varies by configuration: 2.3L 4-cylinder turbocharged ((DSL,TRBO) CA model), 2.3L 4-cylinder turbocharged ((DSL,TRBO)), 2.6L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.6L 4-cylinder ((CAL)(FFS)) | Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder ((CAL)(FFS)), 2.0L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.3L 4-cylinder turbocharged ((DSL,TRBO)), 2.3L 4-cylinder turbocharged ((DSL,TRBO) CA model), 2.6L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.6L 4-cylinder ((CAL)(FFS)) |
| Displacement | 2.3 L to 2.6 L | 2.0 L to 2.6 L |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Aspiration | Turbocharged | Turbocharged |
| Fuel type | Varies by configuration: Diesel, Gasoline | Varies by configuration: Gasoline, Diesel |
| Transmission and drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Varies by configuration: Manual, Automatic | Varies by configuration: Manual, Automatic |
| Gears | 3 to 5 | 3 to 5 |
| Drivetrain | AWD | Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD |
| Fuel economy and range | ||
| Combined | 26 mpg (9.0 L/100 km) to 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) | 28 mpg (8.4 L/100 km) to 18 mpg (13.1 L/100 km) |
| City | 24 mpg (9.8 L/100 km) to 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) | 26 mpg (9.0 L/100 km) to 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) |
| Highway | 28 mpg (8.4 L/100 km) to 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) | 31 mpg (7.6 L/100 km) to 20 mpg (11.8 L/100 km) |