2006 Ford Ranger vs 2006 Isuzu i-280 Extended Cab
Published figures side by side. Rows where our sources have no value for a vehicle read “Not available”. Configurations differ within a model year, so ranges are shown where they apply.
| Specification | 2006 Ford Ranger | 2006 Isuzu i-280 Extended Cab |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | Varies by configuration: 2.3L 4-cylinder, 3.0L 6-cylinder, 4.0L 6-cylinder | 2.8L 4-cylinder |
| Displacement | 2.3 L to 4.0 L | 2.8 L |
| Cylinders | 4 to 6 | 4 |
| Fuel type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission and drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Varies by configuration: Automatic, Manual | Varies by configuration: Automatic, Manual |
| Gears | 5 | 4 to 5 |
| Drivetrain | Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD | RWD |
| Fuel economy and range | ||
| Combined | 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km) to 15 mpg (15.7 L/100 km) | 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) to 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) |
| City | 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) to 14 mpg (16.8 L/100 km) | 18 mpg (13.1 L/100 km) to 15 mpg (15.7 L/100 km) |
| Highway | 27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km) to 18 mpg (13.1 L/100 km) | 25 mpg (9.4 L/100 km) to 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) |