2000 Lexus RX vs 2000 Saturn LW
Published figures side by side. Rows where our sources have no value for a vehicle read “Not available”. Configurations differ within a model year, so ranges are shown where they apply.
| Specification | 2000 Lexus RX | 2000 Saturn LW |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | ||
| Engine | 3.0L 6-cylinder | Varies by configuration: 2.2L 4-cylinder, 3.0L 6-cylinder |
| Displacement | 3.0 L | 2.2 L to 3.0 L |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 to 6 |
| Aspiration | Naturally aspirated | Not available |
| Power | 245 hp (183 kW) | Not available |
| Torque | 233 lb-ft (316 Nm) | Not available |
| Fuel type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Performance | ||
| 0–100 km/h | 7.4 s | Not available |
| Top speed | 124 mph (200 km/h) | Not available |
| Towing capacity | 3,499 lb (1,587 kg) | Not available |
| Transmission and drivetrain | ||
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Gears | 4 | 4 |
| Drivetrain | Varies by configuration: FWD, AWD | FWD |
| Dimensions | ||
| Length | 192.5 in (4,890 mm) | Not available |
| Width | 75.6 in (1,920 mm) | Not available |
| Height | 66.7 in (1,695 mm) | Not available |
| Wheelbase | 112.2 in (2,850 mm) | Not available |
| Weight | ||
| Curb weight | 4,453 lb (2,020 kg) | Not available |
| Fuel economy and range | ||
| Combined | 19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) to 18 mpg (13.1 L/100 km) | 23 mpg (10.2 L/100 km) to 20 mpg (11.8 L/100 km) |
| City | 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) to 16 mpg (14.7 L/100 km) | 19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) to 18 mpg (13.1 L/100 km) |
| Highway | 22 mpg (10.7 L/100 km) to 21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km) | 28 mpg (8.4 L/100 km) to 24 mpg (9.8 L/100 km) |
| Capacity | ||
| Seats | 5 | Not available |
| Doors | 5 | Not available |