Skip to content
AutoSpec Index
Menu

1986 Ford Ranger

US · Pickup · Small Pickup Trucks

The 1986 Ford Ranger is listed in the US market as a pickup. Every figure below carries the source it came from, and anything our sources do not publish is left out rather than estimated.

Engine
Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder, 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS), 2.3L 4-cylinder (NO-CAT), 2.9L 6-cylinder (FFS)
Transmission
Varies by configuration: Manual, Automatic
Drivetrain
Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD
Fuel
Varies by configuration: Gasoline, Diesel
Economy
17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) to 27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km) combined
Generic outline for this body type. An illustration, not a photograph.
Specifications at a Glance

Key Figures

Units:
Engine / Powertrain
2.0L 4-cylinder, 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS), 2.3L 4-cylinder (NO-CAT), 2.9L 6-cylinder (FFS)
Combined Economy
17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) to 27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km) combined
Drivetrain
RWD, AWD
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Market: US·Switch units to convert the figures shown.
Compare 1986 Ford Ranger ↗

Engine

Engine
SpecificationValueSource
EngineVaries by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder, 2.3L 4-cylinder (FFS), 2.3L 4-cylinder (NO-CAT), 2.9L 6-cylinder (FFS)
Displacement2.0 L to 2.9 L
Cylinders4 to 6
Fuel typeVaries by configuration: Gasoline, Diesel

Transmission and drivetrain

Transmission and drivetrain
SpecificationValueSource
TransmissionVaries by configuration: Manual, Automatic
Gears4 to 5
DrivetrainVaries by configuration: RWD, AWD

Fuel economy and range

Fuel economy and range
SpecificationValueSource
Combined17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) to 27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km)
City15 mpg (15.7 L/100 km) to 25 mpg (9.4 L/100 km)
Highway19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km) to 29 mpg (8.1 L/100 km)

Our sources do not publish these for this vehicle: Aspiration, Power, Torque, Electric range, Battery capacity. We leave them out instead of estimating.

Trims and configurations

12 configurations listed by our sources. Engines, drivetrains and fuel economy can differ between them.

Recalls

NHTSA lists 5 recall campaigns for this model year. Last checked November 8, 2026.

  • 98E010000: SERVICE BRAKES, AIR:DISC:ROTOR

    EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: AFTERMARKET BRAKE ROTORS FOR USE ON CERTAIN FORD AND MAZDA TRUCKS. CRACKED CASTINGS CAUSED CRACKS TO APPEAR ON THE OUTER DIAMETER OF THE ROTOR HAT OR AROUND THE STUD HOLE.

    Remedy: AIMCO WILL REIMBURSE CONSUMERS/INSTALLERS FOR THE COST OF REPLACEMENT ROTORS AND INSTALLATION. CONSUMERS ARE REQUESTED TO RETURN TO THE LOCATION WHERE THE ROTORS WERE ORIGINALLY PURCHASED/INSTALLED FOR REPLACEMENT.

    Reported April 8, 1998. View on NHTSA

  • 88V145000: SEATS

    WIRING FOR THE POWER LUMBAR SEAT SYSTEM WAS ROUTED DIRECTLY BENEATH THE SEAT CUSHION SPRINGS AND MAY BE ABRADED BY THE SPRINGS.

    Remedy: INSTALL A FUSE WITHIN THE POWER LUMBAR ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT.

    Reported September 2, 1988. View on NHTSA

  • 87V139000: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS

    SPRING LOCK FUEL LINE COUPLING MAY NOT BE PROPERLY ENGAGED.

    Remedy: INSTALL RETAINER CLIPS OVER THE COUPLINGS TO PREVENT COUPLING SEPARATION AND FUEL LEAKAGE.

    Reported September 4, 1987. View on NHTSA

  • 85V130000: FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE:DELIVERY:HOSES, LINES/PIPING, AND FITTINGS

    NYLON FUEL LINES ON THE FUEL RETURN SIDE OF THE FUEL PRESSURE REGULATOR ASSEMBLY MAY CRACK. CONSEQUENCE OF DEFECT: FUEL LINE COULD LEAK AND, IF AN IGNITION SOURCE IS PRESENT, CREATE THE POTENTIAL FOR A FIRE.

    Remedy: REPLACE NYLON FUEL HOSES WITH RUBBER HOSES.

    Reported October 18, 1985. View on NHTSA

  • 85V116000: ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:WIRING:FRONT UNDERHOOD

    THE ELECTRONIC ENGINE CONTROL WIRING HARNESS INSULATION MAY BE DAMAGED DUE TO COPPER SPIKES PRODUCED DURING THE WELDING OF ITS WIRES. THIS CREATES A POTENTIAL FOR A SHORT CIRCUIT BETWEEN THE WIRES WHICH ENERGIZE THE FUEL PUMP, CAUSING SOME FUEL INJECTORS TO OPEN, DISCHARGING FUEL INTO THE ENGINE.…

    Remedy: REPAIR WIRING HARNESS, CHECK ENGINE AND CATALYST FOR DAMAGE.

    Reported September 24, 1985. View on NHTSA

Data sources

  • EPA fueleconomy.gov · retrieved October 24, 2026 · US Government public data
  • NHTSA vPIC · retrieved October 24, 2026 · US Government public data

Source checked: October 24, 2026

Data verified: October 24, 2026

Specifications can vary by market, trim, configuration and production date. Confirm with the manufacturer before buying parts or making safety decisions. Report an error.

Compare

Related vehicles

  • 1987 Ford Ranger

    Pickup, Varies by configuration: Gasoline, Diesel

    Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.3L 4-cylinder turbocharged ((DSL,TRBO) (NO-CAT)), 2.9L 6-cylinder ((FFS)) · Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD
    26 mpg (9.0 L/100 km) to 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km)

  • 1985 Ford Ranger

    Varies by configuration: Gasoline, Diesel

    Varies by configuration: 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.8L 6-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS) CA model), 2.8L 6-cylinder ((FFS) CA model), 2.0L 4-cylinder, 2.3L 4-cylinder turbocharged ((DSL,TRBO)), 2.3L 4-cylinder · Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD
    27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km) to 15 mpg (15.7 L/100 km)

  • 1986 Ford F150

    Pickup, Gasoline

    Varies by configuration: 4.9L 6-cylinder ((FFS)), 5.0L 8-cylinder ((FFS)), 5.8L 8-cylinder ((FFS)) · 400 hp (298 kW) · Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD
    20 mpg (11.8 L/100 km) to 11 mpg (21.4 L/100 km)

  • 1986 Ford F250

    Pickup, Gasoline

    Varies by configuration: 4.9L 6-cylinder ((FFS)), 5.0L 8-cylinder ((FFS)), 5.8L 8-cylinder ((FFS)) · Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD
    16 mpg (14.7 L/100 km) to 11 mpg (21.4 L/100 km)

  • 1986 Ford Courier

    Pickup, Gasoline

    2.0L 4-cylinder ((FFS)) · RWD
    21 mpg (11.2 L/100 km)

  • Varies by configuration: 2.5L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.8L 6-cylinder ((FFS)) · RWD
    24 mpg (9.8 L/100 km) to 18 mpg (13.1 L/100 km)

  • 1986 Dodge D250 Pickup

    Pickup, Gasoline

    Varies by configuration: 3.7L 6-cylinder, 5.2L 8-cylinder, 5.2L 8-cylinder ((FFS)), 5.9L 8-cylinder · RWD
    15 mpg (15.7 L/100 km) to 11 mpg (21.4 L/100 km)

  • 1986 Chevrolet C20 Pickup

    Pickup, Varies by configuration: Gasoline, Diesel

    Varies by configuration: 4.3L 6-cylinder, 5.0L 8-cylinder ((305)), 5.7L 8-cylinder ((350 V8) (FFS)), 6.2L 8-cylinder ((NO-CAT)) · RWD
    17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) to 12 mpg (19.6 L/100 km)

Explore similar vehicles

Frequently asked questions

What engine does the 1986 Ford Ranger have?

Varies by configuration: 2.0L 4-cylinder, 2.3L 4-cylinder ((FFS)), 2.3L 4-cylinder ((NO-CAT)), 2.9L 6-cylinder ((FFS)). Engines can differ by trim, so check the trim list below.

What is the fuel economy of the 1986 Ford Ranger?

Combined fuel economy is 17 mpg (13.8 L/100 km) to 27 mpg (8.7 L/100 km), as published by the source shown in the specification table.

Is the 1986 Ford Ranger front-wheel, rear-wheel or all-wheel drive?

Drivetrain: Varies by configuration: RWD, AWD.

Are there recalls for the 1986 Ford Ranger?

NHTSA lists 5 recall campaigns for this model year (last checked November 8, 2026). Details are in the Recalls section.